Saturday, November 26, 2011

Miscellaneous Post


                The advancement of technology did not only change an individual’s life, but also the society and economy we are living in. It sure did provide efficiency in the factories with the use of machineries and fast delivery with the use of electronic mail. Machineries are doing all the work for us in the factories, building cars, lifting crates, assembling toys, and manufacturing microchips. Paul Grasso from Press Republican talks about a book “Mind Over Technology” by Richard W. Samson, and he states, “Machines and software begin to do more of the work that people once performed, the labor market in general, and specific job that some people do, will change dramatically… Will the jobs for which some people are trained even continue to exist? In the past, I’ve argued that they won’t, and nothing in Samson’s book caused me to think differently” (Grasso). This goes along with my outlook towards technology expansion that it is losing job opportunities for everyone. Companies no longer need an assembly line to construct a product because the machines are doing everything for them. Postal offices also no longer need delivery man to send our mails to our homes because the electronic mail deliveries them to us. Newspaper companies also no longer need newspaper stand or newspaper delivery to share what is going on around the world because the internet distributes the information to everyone to read. This may be an advantage to companies because they will are making more profit but it also hurts others. People who are looking for a job would have difficulty settling in for a job even though they are considered “jack-of-all –traits”.  I believe that with these innovations we may lose the type of people who are jack-of-all-traits who enjoy working with their hands because technology is doing everything for us and people would not be able to practice using their hands to work. Also, I believe that people who are jack-of-all-traits are supposed to be an advantage in the work field because they are able and know a lot about how things work but with the improvement of technology we no longer need anyone to work just as Mr. Grasso asked, “So, what's a human to do? What's the right career path for someone in today's job market?” (Grasso).  This illustrates that job hunting is now very difficult because people are no longer needed; everything is being done with machines and computers. Also, I think engineers will be the only standing career because they are the ones building and advancing technology. Moreover, some people would still prefer the traditional lifestyle. Most elderlies despite change and would prefer to stay on the same lifestyle, as technology evolves our society; most elderlies have difficulty learning how to use the computers to deliver mail, to log into bank accounts, to call with cell phones, and to read news on the internet. I sometimes prefer a traditional way of doing things such as taking a test. Nowadays, schools use computerize test instead of using traditional pen and paper. I personally prefer the traditional pen and paper test because I would be able to concentrate more, with the new system of computerize test I would have difficulty taking test because there is so much distractions because I am a computer geek, I would be figuring out how fast the computer runs or how they programmed the system and try to see if they programmed it well by doing a series of test to “destroy” it. With all these developments, technology has surely changed the world specifically the working field which tends to have a high unemployment rate. 



Grasso, Paul. “Technology will Continue to Affect Jobs.” Press Republican. N.p., 2010. Web. 26 Nov. 2011. <http://pressrepublican.com/‌0205_columns/‌x1901576035/‌Technology-will-continue-to-affect-jobs>.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Personal Perspective

I am currently tutoring algebra math in Howard Community College and what I notice from student is that they are depending too much on their calculator to solve basic arithmetic and forget the basics of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.  For example, one of the students I tutor has difficulty subtracting 2 - 5 and has to rely on their calculator to tell them the answer, when I tell them not to use their calculators; they get frustrated and end up asking the instructor for help instead because the professor allows them to heavily use the calculator to solve problems. In my opinion, calculators should not be permitted in certain math courses especially in basic algebra courses. In an interview and study done on calculator usage Jennifer Bosley stated, “Among teachers of year 13 calculus, 91.8% sometimes use Graphing Calculators, while 75.4% regularly use them. Among teachers of year 13 statistics, 79.4% sometimes use Graphing Calculators, while 66.7% regularly use them… This is surprising since these courses contain a lot of graphical work on functions that would appear to lend itself to Graphic Calculator work” (Bosley). This irritates the fact that certain math courses require more calculator use than others because of the level of difficulty we are doing. Moreover, I graduated from Centennial High School and throughout my high school years I never used a calculator even at a difficult math course such as Calculus AB AP because my teachers did not allow us to. I think that my teachers have the same belief as I do that calculators tend to make us forget our basic arithmetic. And through this experience, I learned a lot about math. In Addition, coming from another country the Philippines, and learning a new language is difficult. My struggles in English classes are writing literature and what make it even more difficult is the short due dates. I depend tremendously on word processor to spell check, thesaurus use, and grammar check and it feels as though my English grammar does not improve.  All these illustrates that technology has some influence on everyone especially me with the usage of word processor to get my essays done.

Bosley, Jennifer, et al. "Use of calculators in the mathematics classroom." Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology 2.2 (2008): 229+. Academic OneFile. Web. 9 Nov. 2011.

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Opposite Perspective


Others may argue that technology has benefited us and improved our lifestyle. Without it we would not be provided with top education, have any means of communication, and any ways of transportation. I do believe that technology has delivered work efficiency which in a way did benefit and improve our society. However, did the improvement of technology really improve an individual’s livelihood? Be able to think and use our own senses rather that make calculators calculate for us or GPS to navigate for us. King Wayne from The Christian Science Monitor says, “It is not necessary to teach children essential technology skills on a $2,000 computer. In truth, it is a waste of both valuable taxpayer resources and computer horsepower” (King). This illustrates that students such as us do not need these technologies to learn new materials. We ought to know the basics first before we let technology do it for us, such as knowing how to calculate and just use the calculator to verify our solutions. Cell phones, PDA, blackberry, and electronic mail are gadgets used to communicate with one another even though the individuals are thousands of miles away from each other. According to a study by National Public Radio states, “59% of Americans worry that an unauthorized person might gain access to their financial records or personal information on the Internet” this demonstrates that with the improvement of communication devices, we are broadcasting sensitive information around the world to a satellite to be received by another device (Survey Shows Widespread Enthusiasm for High Technology). By doing this, we are exposing our personal information such as name, location, and address to a satellite where almost anyone can just receive it with proper understanding on how radio waves are being transmitted which means that our identity could be easily stolen by criminals. Another way that people could argue that technology has improved our lives is the improvement of automobiles. Modern automobiles are being operated by computer chips such as stepping on the brake, pressing on the gas pedal, and maneuvering the steering wheel all pass through a computer chip to stop the car, shift between gears, and easily turn the car. Numerous stories on the news talk about car recall where cars would not stop accelerating and eventually crash. There are numerous causes to why this happened, one of the reasons Toyota says, “The problem could also be connected to the electronics relay system, the electronic throttle control system with the intelligence” (No Easy Answer to why Toyota Accelerators Stick). This is due to the fact the computer chips were programmed incorrectly therefore there was a failure in the car’s acceleration, this is also because people make mistake, we are not perfect, and this is why technology keeps on improving because we find flaw in our previous system and we want to improve upon them. All these establishes that we should not rely fully on technology because these are man-made system and there might be programming errors in our automobiles, calculators, and GPS systems because we are imperfect. Furthermore, technology can be accessed by anyone hence we should keep an eye out on our personal information so they do not get broadcast and get stolen.


King, Wayne. "TECHNOLOGY IN Education School Needs: Basic? Or Mega-Giga-Cool?" The Christian Science Monitor: 11. National Newspapers Core. Oct 27 1998. Web. 10 Nov. 2011

“No Easy Answer to Why Toyota Accelerators Stick.” MSNBC. N.p., 2011. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/‌id/‌35110966/‌ns/‌business-autos/‌t/‌no-easy-answer-why-toyota-accelerators-stick/‌#.Tsgv6WOImU8>.
“Survey Shows Widespread Enthusiasm for High Technology.” National Public Radio. N.p., 2011. Web. 19 Nov. 2011. <http://www.npr.org/‌programs/‌specials/‌poll/‌technology/>.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

The Use of Technology in Other Countries


Because I grew up in a middle class family from a different country, the Philippines, we did not use any of this luxurious equipment. To begin with, these gadgets were very expensive and only the upper class families were able to afford them. Furthermore, these electronics are considered wants and not considered necessities. Lastly, some of this equipment is restricted in certain places like in schools calculators are prohibited. I believe that there are benefits from limiting ourselves from using these things. The school system in the Philippines and other countries in Asia constrain the use of calculators in school so, we are required to solve equations and do arithmetic by hand. In my opinion, we would benefit from this when we go into the real world because we can figure out how much consumer products will cost, or how much change we should be receiving without having a calculator with us all the time. According to an article, Wayne King states, "Computers in the classrooms are no longer considered a luxury in educating students. They are necessities" (Technology in Education School Needs: Basic? or Mega-Giga-Cool?) This illustrates that computers and gadgets were luxurious items at one point and were not needed to write paper essays, to compute arithmetic functions, or to project subject matter materials to show to the class. As digital technologies keep improving they are being more dependent and more influenced towards the school system. Computers and internet are very expensive in the Philippines, so we rarely use them to write our essays. Therefore, we write mostly with pen and paper and if our teacher can not read our handwriting we receive a zero so we made sure handwriting is legible. This is one reason why my peers say I have a girly handwriting because I was forced to write neatly when I was young. In addition, I notice in the American culture, people are usually in the computer all the time surfing the internet, playing games, or shopping online just as the statistic diagram below stated (Time Spent Social Networking Up To 82%). The table represents the average time a person would spent on the internet, the United States is ranked second highest in this study. This just shows how much time Americans spend on the internet, an average of 6 hours per day! I think this would make them lazy which leads to lack of exercise which is detrimental to their health in the long run. In the Philippines, everyone is constantly moving around, people walking to houses to send a message, children going out to play with one another, or going to the mall to shop because we do not have the luxurious entertainment system such as computers and internet so we look for other sources for entertainment outside our houses. Moreover, getting around from one place to another, we do not use any navigation device to direct us rather we use our sense of direction to get around places. By doing this, I get to explore and know my surrounding environment; overtime this would enable me to read and analyze a map, have a feel of where places are, and know how to approximate the time by knowing the direction of north, east, west, and south and by looking at the position of the sun. I think this benefits me in a way that I can still get around places without the use of a navigation device. Thus, all these reasons show that we really do not need fancy technology in our lives to live and we would still benefit from it.

 "Time Spent Social Networking Up To 82%." Digital Media. N.p., 2011. Web. 17
     Nov. 2011. <http://www.digital-media.net.au/article/
     time-spent-social-networking-up-82/509915.aspx>.

King, Wayne. "TECHNOLOGY IN Education School Needs: Basic? Or Mega-Giga-Cool?" The Christian Science Monitor: 11. National Newspapers Core. Oct 27 1998. Web. 10 Nov. 2011

Monday, November 7, 2011

Technology is Brainwashing Us (crux of argument)


The Technology field is expanding and building up and as years pass by, new improvements, new inventions and new gadgets are coming out of the market. However, I think that people are overusing technology and it is affecting our lives. Moreover, I believe we are all becoming more and more dependent on technology and using it as a crutch instead as a tool, because of the shortcuts technology does for us and we tend to forget how we get there in the first place. For example, students in math classes depend too much on the calculator to solve basic arithmetic and forget how to add, subtract, multiply, and divide by hand. Students in English classes depend too much on word processors to check their spelling and grammar. I am also guilty of this, coming from a different country and learning English as a secondary language, I use this utility to correct my mistakes and because of it, I feel that my English has not improve that much. Drivers depend too much on GPS to locate and navigate to their destination. In an article written by Tom Vanderbilt, he mentioned one driver who was instructed to make a turn on a rail road and eventually crashing with a train coming in front of him (Vanderbilt). There are other numerous stories told about GPS navigation in the news, where drivers just kept obeying the “turn by turn” feature in their GPS without using their senses to determine what path they are heading, whether it is legal to do so or not, and eventually crashing shortly after, because they rely too much on the GPS and fail to read the signs ahead of them. Most of us store our data such as old pictures, memorable videos, touching audio and important documents in our electronic storage devices, and if this device gets lost or infected with a virus, we would feel helpless because all our hard work and projects are lost. We can all relate about how technology has affected our life and how our society relies desperately on these electronics. I believe that if we properly use these gadgets it can benefit us, but if we misuse it we would be affected negatively.



integrate quote from: http://www.npr.org/programs/specials/poll/technology/

370 words
Vanderbilt, Tom. “It Wasn’t Me, Officer! It Was My GPS.” Slate. N.p., 2011. Web. 14 Nov. 2011. <http://www.slate.com/‌articles/‌life/‌transport/‌2010/‌06/‌it_wasnt_me_officer_it_was_my_gps.html>.